small girl. big city. cliches abound.

STL Native. NYU and Columbia Alum. Ain't nothing about this blog consistent. I like what I like.
>

stfuconservatives:

nextyearsgirl:

stfuconservatives:

ethiopienne:

deliciouskaek:

14kgoldnyc:

sanityscraps:

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

inflateablefilth:

nothingaboutus-withoutus:

artemispotter:

(snipped)

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

/An atheist who understands Christian theology better than Bible-thumpers do.

^

(mic drop)

 Welp………………………………………

(Source: drunkonstephen)

blog comments powered by Disqus
  1. broken-renegade reblogged this from blue-cosmic
  2. villains-in-vogue reblogged this from time-to-shank-a-bitch
  3. attack-the-boss reblogged this from fuckin-jaeger
  4. disasterhoft reblogged this from nextyearsgirl
  5. hockey-chic reblogged this from secondstartotherightisneverland
  6. greekgeek4 reblogged this from sevs-girl
  7. kayyahaku reblogged this from carpesherlock
  8. calico-canadian reblogged this from pepinoflavoredd
  9. cypeo reblogged this from oatsprite
  10. annamichaelisteller reblogged this from bad-case-of-lovin-your-writer
  11. crescentnine reblogged this from alwaysthestars
  12. muttly1333 reblogged this from persephone-lapse
  13. frecklydork reblogged this from fuckin-jaeger
  14. high-on-book-food reblogged this from maes-my-name
  15. time-to-shank-a-bitch reblogged this from lickingemokids
  16. whatwhaaaaaaat reblogged this from jager-bombastic-over-here
  17. blue-cosmic reblogged this from heathconcern
  18. lickingemokids reblogged this from carpesherlock
  19. flanduril reblogged this from housefreewill
  20. carpesherlock reblogged this from shinjutori
  21. shinjutori reblogged this from escapedosmil
  22. the-appositive reblogged this from mividaesunchiste
  23. accidentalactivism reblogged this from thecommonraven
  24. icanneverthinkofgoodnames reblogged this from bad-case-of-lovin-your-writer
  25. gin-and-biscuits reblogged this from homosuccubus
  26. greatnessisearned reblogged this from kebarbra
  27. enlightenedaaron reblogged this from happy-nudes
  28. mai-makoto reblogged this from sketchloid
  29. alexandriasilverstein reblogged this from clueforlooks
  30. mika-maniacs reblogged this from alwaysthestars